Publications

Book

Journal Articles

Chapters in Edited Collections

Magazine and Newspaper Articles

Book Reviews

  • Review of Simon Grote, The Emergence of Modern Aesthetic Theory: Religion and Morality in Enlightenment Germany and Scotland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), Eighteenth-Century Studies 52:4 (2019), pp. 441-443.
  • Review of Florike Egmond, Eye for Detail: Images of Plants and Animals in Art and Science (London: Reaktion Books, 2017), British Journal for the History of Science 51:3 (2018), pp. 521-22.
  • Review of Judy A. Hayden (ed.), Literature in the Age of Celestial Discovery: From Copernicus to Flamsteed. (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), Isis 109:1 (2018), pp. 148-49.
  • Review of Seth Lobis, The Virtue of Sympathy: Magic, Philosophy, and Literature in Seventeenth-Century England, Seth (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015), Modern Philology 114 (4) (2017): E254-E256.
  • Review of Nicholas Jardine and Isla Fay (eds.), Observing the World through Images: Diagrams and Figures in the Early-Modern Arts and Science (Brill: Leiden, 2013), Nuncius 31(3) (2016), pp. 653-655.
  • Review of Matthew C. Hunter, Wicked Intelligence: Visual Art and the Science of Experiment in Restoration London (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013), Huntington Library Quarterly 78:1 (2015), pp. 137-139.
  • Review of P.H. Oswald and C.D. Preston (tr. and ed.), John Ray’s Cambridge Catalogue (1660) (London: Ray Society, 2011), History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 35(3) (2013), pp. 468-469.
  • Review of Sorana Corneanu, Regimens of the Mind. Boyle, Locke and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), Intellectual History Review 23(2) (2013), pp. 273-274.
  • Review of Craig Ashley Hanson, The English Virtuoso: Art, Medicine, and Antiquarianism in the Age of Empiricism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), The Seventeenth Century 27(4) (2012), pp. 492-493.
  • Review of William Poole, The World Makers: Scientists of the Restoration and the Search for the Origins of Earth (Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010), British Journal for the History of Science, 44(2) (2011), pp. 289-290.The Emergence of Modern Aesthetic Theory: Religion and Morality in Enlightenment Germany and ScotlandReview of Simon Grote,
  • Review of Florike Egmond, Eye for Detail: Images of Plants and Animals in Art and Science (London: Reaktion Books, 2017), British Journal for the History of Science 51:3 (2018), pp. 521-22.
  • Review of Judy A. Hayden (ed.), Literature in the Age of Celestial Discovery: From Copernicus to Flamsteed. (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), Isis 109:1 (2018), pp. 148-49.
  • Review of Seth Lobis, The Virtue of Sympathy: Magic, Philosophy, and Literature in Seventeenth-Century England, Seth (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015), Modern Philology 114 (4) (2017): E254-E256.
  • Review of Nicholas Jardine and Isla Fay (eds.), Observing the World through Images: Diagrams and Figures in the Early-Modern Arts and Science (Brill: Leiden, 2013), Nuncius 31(3) (2016), pp. 653-655.
  • Review of Matthew C. Hunter, Wicked Intelligence: Visual Art and the Science of Experiment in Restoration London (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013), Huntington Library Quarterly 78:1 (2015), pp. 137-139.
  • Review of P.H. Oswald and C.D. Preston (tr. and ed.), John Ray’s Cambridge Catalogue (1660) (London: Ray Society, 2011), History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 35(3) (2013), pp. 468-469.
  • Review of Sorana Corneanu, Regimens of the Mind. Boyle, Locke and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), Intellectual History Review 23(2) (2013), pp. 273-274.
  • Review of Craig Ashley Hanson, The English Virtuoso: Art, Medicine, and Antiquarianism in the Age of Empiricism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), The Seventeenth Century 27(4) (2012), pp. 492-493.
  • Review of William Poole, The World Makers: Scientists of the Restoration and the Search for the Origins of Earth (Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010), British Journal for the History of Science, 44(2) (2011), pp. 289-290.